Showing posts with label family. Show all posts
Showing posts with label family. Show all posts

Sunday, December 11, 2016

The Scandinavian Woman in Viking Age



Viking grave site, Lindholm Høje, photo:GB


The Viking Age is often displayed as a violent time, dominated by  men who conquered countries and built kingdoms, but the image has changed during the latest 20 years. Archaeological finds from Scandinavia and the Continent bear witness  about the Viking women's daily activities, their power and status from slave to queen.





The daily Life of a Viking woman.


Hjerl Hede, photo:GB
Silkeborg Bymuseum, photo:GB
Most people in  Viking Age were farmers -  or they lived in farms. The management was maintained by a household: the family, some slaves, farm workers and servants, although the knowledge about a Viking household like this is limited today. The economy of the farm was (in Dk) based upon livestock, agriculture and production of textiles and other things for own use. All members of the house took probably part in the daily doings - the archaeological finds show that the production of textiles and metal objects and timber work were gender based for respectively women and men.

Textiles, Silkeborg Bymuseum, photo:GB


textiles, photo:GB
Women could work as craftsmen in the cities, often with the production of textiles for trade, and  they might also take part in doing the trade on behalf of the family. It seems that some women were specialized textile workers since the production- techniques were complicated. The production and trade of textiles were an important part of the economy.


The daily life in the city and on the farm was lived both inside and outside the house. Women took care of the children and of the elderly, they made food and conserved food, like dairy-products and other processing of raw products. The textile production included also processing of wool, spinning and weaving. Unfortunately the textiles from Viking Age are rarely preserved up till today, but some small fragments are found and they show a wide width in the techniques they used and in the quality of the textiles.



The gender roles via the burials of the Vikings tells something. Men and women were often buried in
Højstrup viking graves, photo: GB
their prettiest clothes with grave goods and eventually with sacrificed animals. During the 9th century and in the first half of the 10th century wealthy women wore a dress held together with two oval clamps on the shoulders and with more grave goods  like broches and pearl necklaces and spindle-things - often also with small chests containing textile equipment. Keys are also a common thing in women-graves - maybe marking the status of a house wife. But rich women-graves and rich men- graves were in general rather few. The rich graves seem reserved to the highest class in the social hierarchy. Common people were buried with one or two objects or nothing.





Silkeborg Bymuseum, photo:GB
The ideal Viking woman was a woman between 16-40 years of age. At 16 she was ready to marry and have children and she could take part in the physical hard life on the farm.She enjoyed to some extent more freedom than women in other parts of the medieval contemporary Europe. Written sources represent the Scandinavian woman of Viking age as independent and with rights. Runic inscriptions, especially from Mid Sweden, bear witness about the woman's right to dispose over her property and her rights to inherit. The married couple was jointly responsible for the household and had to trust the partner's willingness to cooperate. An apparently good relation was between a Swedish couple, Holmgaut and Odendisa, since Holmgaut let carve runes in a memorial after his wife "no better housewife will come to Hassmyra to look after the farm" This inscription describes the woman's role in the management of the farm, the organisation of the household and maybe the control of people, animals and ressources. If the husband was out on a Viking expedition the responsibility of everything at home fell to the woman.

Sunday, March 15, 2015

The Vikings - Legal System - Survival of the Fittest.


viking house, Fyrkat/photo gb



Denmark 
Denmark was in the Viking period divided in about two hundred districts, the socalled "herreds", which each had a ting (thing). The thing was the counsil of free swordsmen coming together to manage the law, to issue rulings, and to discuss matters of a more common character..

The law was a complex of customs, something which was remembered from generation to generation. Therefore the thing-assembly was often a case of old men - with support from the old rhyme-formulas (stavrim)  - to remember and claim the law..

The punish provisions towards acts of violence or murder - among free men - were built  upon mandeboden (man's fine) and its various degrees: full mandebod for a killing or cutting off the nose; half mandebod for an eye, quart  mandebod for an ear etc. The warrant was made by the thing-men themselves,  and the law was no doubt not rarely bent to the power, since the enforcement  of the court decision had no special protection. If a member of a strong family during the eternal feuds among the families had insulted or violated a man from a weaker family and had been sentenced a mandebod on the thing, then the weaker part  had to recover the mandebod (the man's fine) himself, which might be difficult or even impossible.This was a shortage of the legal system.
.
law document Sweden wikipedia
The word herred is interpreted as hærfølge = (army escort ). Maybe this points back to a military system where each district (herred)  was obliged to make men or ships available during war. Or else the really big decisions - like election of a king, war and peace or alike - or a court decision of a special complicated or questionable case - were assigned to the big landsting, which in Jutland was held in Viborg, at Zealand in Ringsted and in Skåne (Scania) in Lund. Such difficult cases could be decided by holmgang (duel) following special rules or by  jernbyrd  (ordeal by fire) where they in reality pushed the case respectively to the right of the stronger or the judgment of the gods.

Theft was a dangerous thing to be engaged in, the punishment was simply hanging  which was not  from moral principles, but contrarily with a base in the very realistic view that the thief was a poor man (that was why he stole) and a poor man had only one thing to lose: his life.


Germanic assembly, wikipedia


Like in all other human societies the society of the Vikings was also built on relations and Community. The worst punishment was social exclusion : he who denied to bend to the decision of the herreds-ting and therefore had his case brought to the landsting exposed himself to exclusion The landsting had the power to declare outlaw inside its area. In the length to live his life in isolation, without legal rights, being hunted, excluded from the circle of his fellowmen:  this was impossible, the only ways out were exile or death. But for the man who respected the Viking society's unwritten customs and the rooted view of the law  from the time immemorial, this man could live a flourishing life in prosperity, if he was versatile and had "god  lykke". (good fortune.)


Viking house, Fyrkat, photo gb
A magnate from the grade of the earls had enough to organize, he might lead his own Viking expedition in the summertime, either alone or together with other chiefs and come back for winter with a good prey. He might also be a merchant and lead his own trade business and he had to take care of his own farming. Finally he had to take care of secular and clerical public offices : to judge at the thing and to see to that he - as the gode (Gothi)  of his hov (court) took into account the demand of the gods when it came to cultivating the land and taking care of the law.

Uffe hin Spage, Lorenz Frölich, wikipedia





A means to decide disputes between persons  - or through them between families -  was the holmgang (the duel) The oldest description in a written law fragment from Sweden is about a holmgang-  and it reflects in a realistic way both the sensitive honour which was so vulnerable:  to insult with words and the brutality of the law of the strongest man. The fragment says: " if you say insulting words like: You are not equal to men or: You are not a real man " -  then the two men will have to meet where three roads cross. If he who said the word comes,  and if he who was told the word does not come,  then he'll have to stay as he was named, and then he is not able to give oath or to be a witness - neither in a man's or in a woman's case. If he comes who was told the word , but not he who said the word, then he'll cry three times: "Nidding"  and make a mark in the field. And  he who said the word will then be an inferior man since he dare not stand by what he said.

Now they'll both meet fully armed: if he falls who said the word: a word-crime is the worst - the tongue is the first killer:  he lies on the ground upon his deeds.



Sweden
A similar picture of the legal system in the Viking period is seen in Sweden. Here is also a family society, a life built upon the land-properties of the family and the inner solidarity,  with orally handed-down laws and rules of law, which were put into power by warrants at the thing-assembly of the herred (Swedish: de hundradets). Here is undoubtedly also a system of a common war oganization. And here is also a limited royal power. In the Ansgar- biography is said about Birka, that it was a usual custom to let common cases decide by the agreement of the people rather than on the king's demand. Two concepts were in front of life of the Nordic Viking: den gode lykke = the good fortune - the prosperity of the fortunate man - and æren (the honour) which had to be protected and must not be breached.

Norway
Hakon the Good, P.N.Arboe, wikipedia.
The same schedule is found in Norway as to the secular building of society. The indivual bygder (settlements) had their local thing-assemblies, and the large districts had their own more comprehensive things, where chiefs and old experienced men were judges and interpretors of the law. In Norway is also the family society with the single man, the private person, who seeks his right supported by his family via mandebod for a revenge-killing.
Like in Denmark and Sweden the problem is the same in Norway. Direct primary sources to a knowledge about the legal system of the Viking period are missing,  it is only possible to refer to the medieval laws, the * Frostatingloven  and the *Gulatingloven  (both laws are Norwegian laws, which acccording to the sagas were ordained by Hakon the Good for respectively Trøndelagen and Vestlandet). Like in Denmark there is reason to believe that there was a military system too in Norway ( a leding) where each district  was obliged to deliver ships and warriors to a common defense. And like in Denmark and Sweden it is also the same for Norway:  that the royal power was limited by the thing-assemblies and  folkets vilje ( will of the people). Anyway the king's power must not be too much reduced, for the king had his team of housecarls , his hird, which from an original private organization grew up to a half public factor  - a very active means of power which became the core of a larger army 



Iceland.
A Gothi /priest) Lund, wikipedia.
Iceland had no king. The legal system was established after west-Norwegian design and after the rules in the later Gulatinglov. This thing-constitution became common to the whole island from year 930. The common thing was held each summer( named altinget), with the lovsigemand (the man who  recited the law rules) and with the heathen priests (the Gothis) as the real rulers. The island was later divided into four quarters each with 3 (one with 4) herredsting. Since the magnates were goder (Gothis) it must be said about the Icelandic free state that it was a regular chief-union without a king. An oligarchy in a classical saying.















Source: Johannes Brøndsted: Vikingerne;. Vikingen hjemme, Samfund.  Ggyldendal 1960



Sunday, October 16, 2011

The Vikings - Family Life

relief, Tømmerby church
When times were peaceful, and the Viking lived at home with wife and children, he was a family man. The family was the most important of all, everyone supported and helped each other.

eating porridge
How was the daily food of the Viking? There has been much speculation about this, and a reconstruction of a Viking menu was made from the Saga-informations. Although the sagas were written in the 1300-14000s it is okay to assume that Mrs. Viking's daily housekeeping included things like  whole grain bread (rye), oat- and barley porridge,  fish (not at least herring) , various meat like mutton, lamb , goat, horse, oxe, calf, pork, and there were cheese and butter and cream, and not to forget beer and mjod (mead) - and there was wine for rich people. Especially in Norway and Iceland were whale, seal and polar bear important meat on the menu. Cooking and roasting were known. They probably also knew how to dry fish and meat. Catching birds played also an important role. Among the vegetables were cabbage and onions the most popular, and the fruit came from bushes and trees, like apples, berries and hazelnuts. They had bee-honey from which they made the sweet fermented drink, mjød. They probably knew how to keep the food fresh with ice and salt and sour whey.  They took salt from the sea water and from burning seaweed.

lichen
In places where the sea was far away and the forest was close the hunt was important. Hunting the big animals of the woods like elk, red deer, roe deer, wild boar, bear - they all contributed to the kitchen and the storeroom,  also the hare in the field and the geese and the chicken in the yard. In the northernest part of Scandinavia were also the reindeer and the bison. Nature was rich, but although it was easy to represent a comprehensive menu, there were poor districts, and in times of crop failures there might be famine, and people had to find emergency solutions like eating red seaweed, bark and lichen.


The viking had both table and chair, things like table cloth and plates were known, and he used spoon and knife, but not fork. It arrived later. It was supposedly usual to eat twice a day, a meal in the morning called davre and a meal in the evening called nadver. It was told that king Harald Hardrada only had one meal a day. He had it brought, before others came to the table, and when he had finished his meal he knocked on the table with his knife handle and ordered the food removed, while people were still hungry, following the food with sad eyes. The king was not to be opposed. I guess they had their head cut off if they quarrelled.

Were the Vikings cleanly? Some say yes, some say no, some say  they were cleanly if they had to, others that if it wasn't necessary, then they relaxed. Well, at least  they had combs and razors and all the things needed to take care of themselves. The literature from the Saga-period indicates that the Icelanders and the Norwegians were cleanly. One of the first stanzas in the Hávámal says about the guest: "he needs water at the host's table, a greeting and a handkerchief". Later is said: "Clean and satisfied should every man ride to the Thing, even though he has not got fine clothes". One of the weekdays, Saturday, was named after wash. An Icelandic physician Skuli Guðjonson draws the attention to that a mountain was sacred and that no one must turn an unwashed face to it.

The Arab Ibn Talad gives a drastic description of the Swedish Rus-people's bad uncleanliness. When he visited the districts by Volga (ab. 920), he noticed this more closely . "They are", he says, " the most unclean of God's creatures, they do not clean themselves after excrements or urination, they do not wash after ejaculation, and they do not wash their hands after meal. They are like savage donkeys". He describes their morning-toilet, which is done in a common washbowl, where the water is as dirty and as unclean as you can imagine. "The girl comes each morning with a big bowl with water. She gives it to her master; he washes his hands, his face and hair, he both washes and combs his hair in the bowl. Then he blows his nose and spits in the bowl. He leaves no dirt outside the water. When he has finished, the girl carries the bowl to the next man, and he does the same as the first. She keeps on carrying the bowl from one to another, until each one in the house has used it, spitting and blowing their nose and washing face and hair in the same bowl." 

This does not sound very cosy, but it is counterbalanced by some nice statements from another Arab, Ibn Rustad, who describes and praises the Vikings for their hospitality, their courage , their just decisions after a fight, and their burial rituals. "Their bodies are slim, they are good looking, they are frank and honest. They wear wide trousers; to each pair is used 100 meters (!) material. They put them on by rolling the fabric around their knees and fasten them there. Their clothes are clean, and the men like to wear bracelets in gold. They treat their slaves well and give them exquisite clothes. They honor their guests and treat the strangers well who seek refuge and everyone who come visiting. They do not allow their guests to be attacked by anynone, they help and defend them . They have got *sulaimanisc swords. If a group is called out for war, they all go out. They stick together like one man against their enemies until they have won victory". That was a nicer story!

* sulaimanisc swords are from Iran / Persia.

finds from the Viking town under Århus
Literary sources say about the Danes, who lived in England that they combed their hair, took a bath each Saturday and changed clothes very often "to be able to overwin the chastity of the women and to get a daughter from nobility as a mistress". The conclusion is not that the Norwegians and the Icelanders were clean, that the Swedes were dirty and the Danes were clean. The common view must be that the Nordic Viking was not unfamiliar with cleanliness, but if the circumstances did not force him, then he might relax.
comb from the Viking town under Århus

It is not known if the Vikings knew about soap. In coarser laundry they possibly used staled cow-urine like they did later on Iceland. The ammonia was a fine cleaner.

Mrs. Viking
The Viking loved luxurious clothes. In Dublin the Irish found from the conquered Norweigan Limerick large stores of gold, silver and woven material in all colours: satin, silk and cloth. The Arab Ibn Fadlan says about the Swedish Rus-people  by Volga and in the western Russia : " I saw the Rus-people when they came on their trading expedition. I have never seen people with a more perfect body building. They are tall like date palms and reddish. They do not wear a robe or a caftan; the man wears a cloak, which covers half his body,  leaving one hand to stick out from it. From his nails to the neck is a collection of trees, figures and other things. (this must be tatoos). (...) Their women have a container on the breast, it is tied and is in either iron, copper, silver or gold, according to her husband's riches. In each container is a ring with a knife, also tied to the chest. Around the neck the women have necklaces in gold and silver. When the husband owns ten thousand dirhems, then he makes a necklace for his wife. When he has got twenty thousand dirhems, he makes two necklaces. In this way his wife gets a new necklace for each ten thousand dirhems he adds to his fortune. So the women wear often many necklaces. Their finest jewelry is a green glass pearl. "


Viking dress, King Aethelstan (900s)
But there are archaeological examinations, which tells us about the Viking's clothes.  The men wore a shirt, maybe two; the trousers were in two characteristic fashions, one was ankle-long and narrow, the other was a kind of plus fours, and for these he wore stockings and wrapping bands. He also wore a cloak,  held together with a buckle on the right shoulder.


The medicine was primitive, but they might have had some experience in treatment of wounds. They were often in fight and got some heavy wounds. The Icelandic physician Skuli Goðjonson says that Snorre's tale about Stiklestad  (1030) is an interesting piece of medicine. Thormod Kolbrunarskjald dies after having drawn out the arrow from his heart himself. "I have not yet fat in my heart-roots," he says, while he is watching the shreds, hanging from the barbs of the arrow. Snorre tells about the lazaret in the barn at Stiklestad, where the women heated the water (possibly sterilisation) and dressed the wounds, possibly partly antiseptic. Then they prepared a fluent porridge of onion and herbs and let the wounded man eat it, whereafter they examined, if they could smell the onions from the abdomen, undoubtedly in order to find out, if there was a hole in the guts. If so it was perotinitis, and they knew this meant death. They used the onions to make a diagnosis like we today give test meals.

Viking board game, Wessex
In daily life the Viking liked to play board game. There is a wellknown episod between Cnut the Great and his brother-in-law Ulf Jarl playing a chess. But the Vikings also played checkers and hund efter hare (hound chasing hare). The Nordic word for board game = tavlebord is a loan word in Welsh. The board game has left several archaeological traces, both board and pieces. In the Gokstad ship (900) was a game board made for various games on both sides, and at Ballinderry in Ireland was in 1932 found a well-kept game board in tax-wood, probably a "hound chasing hare"-game, with Norse-Celtic ornaments. It is now in the National Museum in Dublin. It belongs to the middle of the 10th century, and it was probably made at the Isle of Man. There have been found several  game-pieces from the Viking period and the early Middle Ages.

     
relief, Tømmerby church
In times of peace the Viking was a family man; he loved his wife and his children. When a marriage had to be made, the two families came to an agreement, and there were only conflicts, if the young lovers were upsetting the interests of the mighty family. For the family was mighty. Inside the large blurred society the family was a strong place of refuge. The family members stayed by the family during kill and unrest, they got help and support from relatives, and they were under the obligation to do the same. Woe he, who dared to betray his family. He was expelled from the family, he became an outlaw. But just being a member of a mighty powerful family could be dangerous. A man could not take care of himself by keeping to himself. He had the obligations to react on his family's behalf, and that might lead a peaceful man into heavy complications. Hávámal praises the good friend several times. Behind this lies that you have to be prepared. "He who has no friend is in danger".


An example of a chief's  family in the 1000s: The family-feeling in the large families from that time did not reach only parents, children and siblings, but also cousins, uncles and aunts, nephews and grand nephews. The family had friends and faithful companions too. Under the family were different serving people and slaves and maybe also military - like the farmers, who lived on the family estate, being attached to them in both work and war. All this formed something difficult to namecall. It might be called a Family Union , but also a 'clan' like in Scotland. In that period was often used the latin term 'familia', which might be interpreted like a 'large household'.


The Nordic Viking was open for satire and sarcasm. He himself was scared ot the power of an evil tongue. Hávámal sometimes speaks with a delightful serene irony, when it is about the phenomenon "hospitality without riscy generosity ".
"Some would invite me to visit their homes,
But none thought I needed a meal,
As though I had eaten a whole joint,
Just before with a friend who had two".

The Viking had a sharp eye for the flaws and peculiarities in his fellowman. The custom of giving nick-names was common. They loved to hand out nick names, especially to kings and chiefs. Harald Bluetooth, Sweyn Forkbeard, Harald Fairhair. Many nick-names point at blemishes, like Sigurd Snake-in-the-Eye, Ivar the Boneless, and names like Catback, Crowfoot, Juice Roach, (who might have had some rash on his head, or maybe he liked to drink plant-juices) -   and on Iceland was  Egil Skallagrimsson (=  ugly roach). It is said about Egil that he exhibited berserk behaviour, and this, together with the description of his large and unattractive head, has led to the theory that he might have suffered from Paget's disease. This is corroborated by an archeological find of a head from the Viking era which might be Egil's. At the same time there is a capriciousity in the nick-names. They meant sometimes the opposite of, what they actually meant,  like "Tord the Short". It is known that he was a very tall man. So it is not easy to guess, what a Viking's nick-name really meant.


Hagar the Horrible



Source: 
Johannes Brøndsted, Vikingerne, Gyldendal 1960; Arkæologisk magasin Skalk, 1/1989, 2/1965, 4/1995. Danmarkshistorie, bd. 3, Da Danmark blev Danmark, (700-1050), Peter Sawyer, Gyldendal og Politiken. "Thi de var af stor slægt", Marianne Johannesen og Helle Halding.